Guatemala vs Portugal: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Guatemala
- Portugal
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 139,743 million SLC against 121,967 million SLC in Portugal, a difference of 17,776 million SLC.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Portugal ahead.
Guatemala ranks 69th and Portugal ranks 71st of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84,196 million SLC | 88,091 million SLC | 3,895 million SLC | Portugal |
| 2020s | 122,564 million SLC | 105,411 million SLC | 17,153 million SLC | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Guatemala or Portugal?
- Guatemala, at 139,743 million SLC against 121,967 million SLC in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Guatemala and Portugal?
- 17,776 million SLC, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Portugal rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Guatemala ranks 69th and Portugal ranks 71st of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.