Guatemala vs New Zealand: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Guatemala
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 176,047 million SLC against 139,743 million SLC in Guatemala, a difference of 36,304 million SLC.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 67th of 114 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84,196 million SLC | 99,033 million SLC | 14,836 million SLC | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 122,564 million SLC | 148,578 million SLC | 26,014 million SLC | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Guatemala or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 176,047 million SLC against 139,743 million SLC in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Guatemala and New Zealand?
- 36,304 million SLC, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Guatemala ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 67th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.