El Salvador vs Oman: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- El Salvador
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 12,241 million SLC against 11,222 million SLC in El Salvador, a difference of 1,019 million SLC.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 101st and Oman ranks 99th of 114 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,682 million SLC | 4,724 million SLC | 1,042 million SLC | Oman |
| 2010s | 6,505 million SLC | 12,702 million SLC | 6,197 million SLC | Oman |
| 2020s | 10,008 million SLC | 12,264 million SLC | 2,256 million SLC | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, El Salvador or Oman?
- Oman, at 12,241 million SLC against 11,222 million SLC in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between El Salvador and Oman?
- 1,019 million SLC, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Oman?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Oman rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- El Salvador ranks 101st and Oman ranks 99th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.