China, Hong Kong SAR vs South Sudan: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 796,382 million SLC against 766,000 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 30,382 million SLC.
Across all 11 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 49th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 114 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 496,677 million SLC | 51,072 million SLC | 445,605 million SLC | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 814,500 million SLC | 468,831 million SLC | 345,669 million SLC | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, China, Hong Kong SAR or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 796,382 million SLC against 766,000 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
- 30,382 million SLC, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 49th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.