Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 15,282 million SLC against 15,027 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 255 million SLC.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Panama ranks 95th of 114 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,202 million SLC | 12,768 million SLC | 3,566 million SLC | Panama |
| 2020s | 10,087 million SLC | 14,885 million SLC | 4,798 million SLC | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Panama?
- Panama, at 15,282 million SLC against 15,027 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
- 255 million SLC, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Panama ranks 95th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.