Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Belarus
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 91,272 million SLC against 86,302 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 4,970 million SLC.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 75th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 76th of 114 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,564 million SLC | 44,594 million SLC | 38,029 million SLC | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 22,575 million SLC | 62,823 million SLC | 40,248 million SLC | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Belarus or Guinea-Bissau?
- Belarus, at 91,272 million SLC against 86,302 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 4,970 million SLC, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Belarus ranks 75th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 76th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.