Austria vs Belgium: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 334,546 million SLC against 271,309 million SLC in Austria, a difference of 63,237 million SLC.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 61st and Belgium ranks 59th of 114 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130,577 million SLC | 156,679 million SLC | 26,102 million SLC | Belgium |
| 2010s | 173,374 million SLC | 223,035 million SLC | 49,661 million SLC | Belgium |
| 2020s | 240,535 million SLC | 299,041 million SLC | 58,505 million SLC | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Austria or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 334,546 million SLC against 271,309 million SLC in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Austria and Belgium?
- 63,237 million SLC, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Austria ranks 61st and Belgium ranks 59th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.