Afghanistan vs New Caledonia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Afghanistan
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 618,739 million SLC against 518,693 million SLC in New Caledonia, a difference of 100,046 million SLC.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 53rd and New Caledonia ranks 54th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 298,241 million SLC | 367,222 million SLC | 68,980 million SLC | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 684,266 million SLC | 484,935 million SLC | 199,332 million SLC | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Afghanistan or New Caledonia?
- Afghanistan, at 618,739 million SLC against 518,693 million SLC in New Caledonia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Afghanistan and New Caledonia?
- 100,046 million SLC, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and New Caledonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Afghanistan and New Caledonia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Afghanistan ranks 53rd and New Caledonia ranks 54th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.