Sri Lanka vs United Arab Emirates: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Sri Lanka
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 17,198 million USD against 16,990 million USD in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 208 million USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 74th and United Arab Emirates ranks 75th of 173 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15,026 million USD | 16,564 million USD | 1,538 million USD | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 16,358 million USD | 16,650 million USD | 292.38 million USD | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Sri Lanka or United Arab Emirates?
- Sri Lanka, at 17,198 million USD against 16,990 million USD in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates?
- 208 million USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Sri Lanka ranks 74th and United Arab Emirates ranks 75th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.