Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 19,246 million USD against 17,198 million USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2,048 million USD.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tunisia ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 71st of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,458 million USD | 7,726 million USD | 1,269 million USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 14,667 million USD | 13,815 million USD | 852.74 million USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 16,358 million USD | 17,812 million USD | 1,454 million USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 19,246 million USD against 17,198 million USD in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 2,048 million USD, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Sri Lanka ranks 74th and Tunisia ranks 71st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.