Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 6,166 million USD against 6,122 million USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 44 million USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 107th of 173 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,340 million USD | 2,455 million USD | 1,115 million USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 2,974 million USD | 3,471 million USD | 497.45 million USD | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 4,727 million USD | 5,180 million USD | 453.15 million USD | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 6,166 million USD against 6,122 million USD in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 44 million USD, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Mongolia ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 107th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.