Mauritius vs Sudan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Mauritius
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 5,628 million USD against 4,801 million USD in Mauritius, a difference of 827 million USD.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 109th of 173 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,020 million USD | 10,686 million USD | 8,667 million USD | Sudan |
| 2010s | 2,950 million USD | 9,335 million USD | 6,386 million USD | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Mauritius or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 5,628 million USD against 4,801 million USD in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Mauritius and Sudan?
- 827 million USD, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and Sudan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Mauritius ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 109th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.