Lithuania vs Nepal: Total Expenditure (central government) β Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) β Value US$ over time
- Lithuania
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 27,188 million USD against 25,364 million USD in Lithuania, a difference of 1,824 million USD.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 60th of 172 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,254 million USD | 1,425 million USD | 5,830 million USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 11,628 million USD | 5,530 million USD | 6,097 million USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 21,205 million USD | 12,628 million USD | 8,576 million USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) β value us$, Lithuania or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 27,188 million USD against 25,364 million USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) β value us$ between Lithuania and Nepal?
- 1,824 million USD, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nepal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Nepal rank globally for total expenditure (central government) β value us$?
- Lithuania ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 60th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) β Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.