Jordan vs Nigeria: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Jordan
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 16,841 million USD against 15,499 million USD in Jordan, a difference of 1,342 million USD.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 78th and Nigeria ranks 76th of 173 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,804 million USD | 17,344 million USD | 11,540 million USD | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 10,797 million USD | 27,510 million USD | 16,713 million USD | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 14,690 million USD | 30,613 million USD | 15,923 million USD | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Jordan or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 16,841 million USD against 15,499 million USD in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Jordan and Nigeria?
- 1,342 million USD, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Nigeria?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Nigeria rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Jordan ranks 78th and Nigeria ranks 76th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.