Grenada vs Solomon Islands: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Grenada
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 627.13 million USD against 488.48 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 138.65 million USD.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.3 times Grenada's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 159th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 173 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 261.22 million USD | 531.54 million USD | 270.32 million USD | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 392.93 million USD | 517.28 million USD | 124.36 million USD | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Grenada or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 627.13 million USD against 488.48 million USD in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Grenada and Solomon Islands?
- 138.65 million USD, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Solomon Islands?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Solomon Islands rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Grenada ranks 159th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.