Ecuador vs Kenya: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Ecuador
- Kenya
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 27,558 million USD against 26,740 million USD in Kenya, a difference of 818 million USD.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 61st of 173 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,536 million USD | 4,691 million USD | 2,844 million USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 27,405 million USD | 17,465 million USD | 9,940 million USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 28,298 million USD | 24,370 million USD | 3,929 million USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Ecuador or Kenya?
- Ecuador, at 27,558 million USD against 26,740 million USD in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Ecuador and Kenya?
- 818 million USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 61st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.