Azerbaijan vs Serbia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$ over time
- Azerbaijan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22,516 million USD against 20,941 million USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1,575 million USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Serbia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,363 million USD | 18,240 million USD | 4,876 million USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 17,432 million USD | 14,454 million USD | 2,978 million USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 19,176 million USD | 17,571 million USD | 1,605 million USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, Azerbaijan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22,516 million USD against 20,941 million USD in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$ between Azerbaijan and Serbia?
- 1,575 million USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Serbia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$?
- Azerbaijan ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.