Republic of Korea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Republic of Korea
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 449,528 million USD against 13,443 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 436,085 million USD.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 33.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 173 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 203,921 million USD | 2,963 million USD | 200,959 million USD | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 296,846 million USD | 9,044 million USD | 287,801 million USD | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 463,431 million USD | 13,444 million USD | 449,987 million USD | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Republic of Korea or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Republic of Korea, at 449,528 million USD against 13,443 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 436,085 million USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Republic of Korea ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.