Puerto Rico vs Uzbekistan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Puerto Rico
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 34,994 million USD against 31,896 million USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3,098 million USD.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 173 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22,422 million USD | 9,769 million USD | 12,652 million USD | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 30,300 million USD | 24,272 million USD | 6,027 million USD | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Puerto Rico or Uzbekistan?
- Puerto Rico, at 34,994 million USD against 31,896 million USD in Uzbekistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Puerto Rico and Uzbekistan?
- 3,098 million USD, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Puerto Rico and Uzbekistan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Puerto Rico ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.