Poland vs Saudi Arabia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Poland
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 267,171 million USD against 195,422 million USD in Poland, a difference of 71,749 million USD.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.4 times Poland's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 17th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 173 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 115,756 million USD | 224,160 million USD | 108,404 million USD | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 171,021 million USD | 247,600 million USD | 76,579 million USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Poland or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 267,171 million USD against 195,422 million USD in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Poland and Saudi Arabia?
- 71,749 million USD, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Saudi Arabia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Poland ranks 17th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.