Oman vs Uzbekistan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Oman
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 31,896 million USD against 27,225 million USD in Oman, a difference of 4,671 million USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 58th and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 173 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31,504 million USD | 9,769 million USD | 21,735 million USD | Oman |
| 2020s | 28,875 million USD | 27,604 million USD | 1,270 million USD | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Oman or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 31,896 million USD against 27,225 million USD in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Oman and Uzbekistan?
- 4,671 million USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Uzbekistan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Oman ranks 58th and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.