Malawi vs Rwanda: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Malawi
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3,963 million USD against 3,756 million USD in Malawi, a difference of 207 million USD.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 116th of 173 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,566 million USD | 1,800 million USD | 233.7 million USD | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 3,135 million USD | 3,631 million USD | 496.37 million USD | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Malawi or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 3,963 million USD against 3,756 million USD in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Malawi and Rwanda?
- 207 million USD, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Malawi ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 116th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.