Lebanon vs Maldives: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Lebanon
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 3,253 million USD against 3,142 million USD in Lebanon, a difference of 111 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 123rd and Maldives ranks 122nd of 173 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,403 million USD | 807.44 million USD | 9,596 million USD | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 13,849 million USD | 1,402 million USD | 12,447 million USD | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 3,660 million USD | 2,477 million USD | 1,183 million USD | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Lebanon or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 3,253 million USD against 3,142 million USD in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Lebanon and Maldives?
- 111 million USD, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Maldives?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Maldives rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Lebanon ranks 123rd and Maldives ranks 122nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.