Czechia vs Romania: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Czechia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 74,340 million USD against 64,349 million USD in Czechia, a difference of 9,991 million USD.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 41st and Romania ranks 38th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51,087 million USD | 36,656 million USD | 14,431 million USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 54,917 million USD | 46,047 million USD | 8,870 million USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 64,610 million USD | 66,778 million USD | 2,169 million USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Czechia or Romania?
- Romania, at 74,340 million USD against 64,349 million USD in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Czechia and Romania?
- 9,991 million USD, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Romania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Romania rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Czechia ranks 41st and Romania ranks 38th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.