Belarus vs Myanmar: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Belarus
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 14,230 million USD against 11,536 million USD in Belarus, a difference of 2,694 million USD.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 78th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,066 million USD | 1,582 million USD | 4,485 million USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 10,369 million USD | 12,387 million USD | 2,018 million USD | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Belarus or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 14,230 million USD against 11,536 million USD in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Belarus and Myanmar?
- 2,694 million USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Myanmar?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Myanmar rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Belarus ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 78th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.