Bangladesh vs Kuwait: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Bangladesh
- Kuwait
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 49,155 million USD against 46,442 million USD in Kuwait, a difference of 2,713 million USD.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kuwait ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 47th and Kuwait ranks 48th of 173 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,006 million USD | 35,267 million USD | 23,261 million USD | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 23,749 million USD | 51,496 million USD | 27,748 million USD | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 44,678 million USD | 57,564 million USD | 12,886 million USD | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Bangladesh or Kuwait?
- Bangladesh, at 49,155 million USD against 46,442 million USD in Kuwait as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Bangladesh and Kuwait?
- 2,713 million USD, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kuwait?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Kuwait rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Bangladesh ranks 47th and Kuwait ranks 48th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.