Bangladesh vs Hungary: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Bangladesh
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 58,795 million USD against 49,155 million USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 9,640 million USD.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 47th and Hungary ranks 44th of 173 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,006 million USD | 35,812 million USD | 23,807 million USD | Hungary |
| 2010s | 23,749 million USD | 42,748 million USD | 18,999 million USD | Hungary |
| 2020s | 46,508 million USD | 58,981 million USD | 12,473 million USD | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Bangladesh or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 58,795 million USD against 49,155 million USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Bangladesh and Hungary?
- 9,640 million USD, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Hungary?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Hungary rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Bangladesh ranks 47th and Hungary ranks 44th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.