Azerbaijan vs Lithuania: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Azerbaijan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 16,584 million USD against 16,480 million USD in Lithuania, a difference of 104 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Lithuania ranks 72nd of 173 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,410 million USD | 10,178 million USD | 2,233 million USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 15,513 million USD | 10,384 million USD | 5,129 million USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 17,454 million USD | 15,321 million USD | 2,133 million USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Azerbaijan or Lithuania?
- Azerbaijan, at 16,584 million USD against 16,480 million USD in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 104 million USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Lithuania rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Lithuania ranks 72nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.