Poland vs Saudi Arabia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Poland
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.37 million million SLC against 1.08 million million SLC in Poland, a difference of 295,480 million SLC.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 62nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 174 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 434,996 million SLC | 943,383 million SLC | 508,387 million SLC | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 836,348 million SLC | 1.19 million million SLC | 353,038 million SLC | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Poland or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.37 million million SLC against 1.08 million million SLC in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Poland and Saudi Arabia?
- 295,480 million SLC, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Saudi Arabia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Poland ranks 62nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.