New Zealand vs Sudan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- New Zealand
- Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 158,834 million SLC against 136,916 million SLC in Sudan, a difference of 21,918 million SLC.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 93rd and Sudan ranks 96th of 174 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68,360 million SLC | 24,595 million SLC | 43,765 million SLC | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 81,653 million SLC | 59,966 million SLC | 21,687 million SLC | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, New Zealand or Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 158,834 million SLC against 136,916 million SLC in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between New Zealand and Sudan?
- 21,918 million SLC, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Sudan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- New Zealand ranks 93rd and Sudan ranks 96th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.