Lesotho vs Slovenia: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Lesotho
- Slovenia
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 21,335 million SLC against 20,426 million SLC in Slovenia, a difference of 909 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Slovenia ahead.
Lesotho ranks 133rd and Slovenia ranks 134th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,230 million SLC | 8,545 million SLC | 3,316 million SLC | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 14,373 million SLC | 12,072 million SLC | 2,301 million SLC | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 19,321 million SLC | 18,673 million SLC | 648.48 million SLC | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Lesotho or Slovenia?
- Lesotho, at 21,335 million SLC against 20,426 million SLC in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Lesotho and Slovenia?
- 909 million SLC, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Slovenia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Slovenia rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Lesotho ranks 133rd and Slovenia ranks 134th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.