Latvia vs Seychelles: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Latvia
- Seychelles
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 11,537 million SLC against 11,264 million SLC in Seychelles, a difference of 273 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 141st of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,673 million SLC | 2,664 million SLC | 2,009 million SLC | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5,504 million SLC | 6,129 million SLC | 625.71 million SLC | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 9,902 million SLC | 10,753 million SLC | 850.65 million SLC | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Latvia or Seychelles?
- Latvia, at 11,537 million SLC against 11,264 million SLC in Seychelles as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Latvia and Seychelles?
- 273 million SLC, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Seychelles?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Seychelles rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Latvia ranks 140th and Seychelles ranks 141st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.