Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Uzbekistan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 293.93 million million SLC against 21.65 million million SLC in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 272.27 million million SLC.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 13.6 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 4th and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 12 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 293.93 million million SLC against 21.65 million million SLC in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 272.27 million million SLC, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Uzbekistan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 4th and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 12 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.