Ireland vs Sudan: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Ireland
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 136,916 million SLC against 106,094 million SLC in Ireland, a difference of 30,822 million SLC.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 99th and Sudan ranks 96th of 174 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75,667 million SLC | 24,595 million SLC | 51,072 million SLC | Ireland |
| 2010s | 75,728 million SLC | 59,966 million SLC | 15,762 million SLC | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Ireland or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 136,916 million SLC against 106,094 million SLC in Ireland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Ireland and Sudan?
- 30,822 million SLC, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Ireland and Sudan rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Ireland ranks 99th and Sudan ranks 96th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.