Ireland vs Peru: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Ireland
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 130,436 million SLC against 106,094 million SLC in Ireland, a difference of 24,342 million SLC.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 99th and Peru ranks 97th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,280 million SLC | 45,246 million SLC | 9,034 million SLC | Ireland |
| 2010s | 74,892 million SLC | 81,685 million SLC | 6,793 million SLC | Peru |
| 2020s | 94,264 million SLC | 117,388 million SLC | 23,124 million SLC | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Ireland or Peru?
- Peru, at 130,436 million SLC against 106,094 million SLC in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Ireland and Peru?
- 24,342 million SLC, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Peru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Peru rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Ireland ranks 99th and Peru ranks 97th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.