Iceland vs Togo: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Iceland
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1.62 million million SLC against 1.57 million million SLC in Iceland, a difference of 55,640 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 54th and Togo ranks 53rd of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 507,302 million SLC | 241,164 million SLC | 266,139 million SLC | Iceland |
| 2010s | 749,180 million SLC | 675,412 million SLC | 73,768 million SLC | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.33 million million SLC | 1.36 million million SLC | 30,168 million SLC | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Iceland or Togo?
- Togo, at 1.62 million million SLC against 1.57 million million SLC in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Iceland and Togo?
- 55,640 million SLC, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Togo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Togo rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Iceland ranks 54th and Togo ranks 53rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.