Guyana vs Poland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Guyana
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.08 million million SLC against 781,881 million SLC in Guyana, a difference of 297,359 million SLC.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Guyana's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 64th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 101,804 million SLC | 294,945 million SLC | 193,141 million SLC | Poland |
| 2010s | 192,783 million SLC | 434,996 million SLC | 242,212 million SLC | Poland |
| 2020s | 534,742 million SLC | 775,625 million SLC | 240,882 million SLC | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Guyana or Poland?
- Poland, at 1.08 million million SLC against 781,881 million SLC in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Guyana and Poland?
- 297,359 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Poland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Poland rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Guyana ranks 64th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.