Ethiopia vs Poland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Ethiopia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.08 million million SLC against 776,236 million SLC in Ethiopia, a difference of 303,004 million SLC.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 65th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,014 million SLC | 269,653 million SLC | 244,639 million SLC | Poland |
| 2010s | 181,759 million SLC | 434,996 million SLC | 253,237 million SLC | Poland |
| 2020s | 576,576 million SLC | 836,348 million SLC | 259,772 million SLC | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Ethiopia or Poland?
- Poland, at 1.08 million million SLC against 776,236 million SLC in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Ethiopia and Poland?
- 303,004 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Poland rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Ethiopia ranks 65th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.