Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.24 million million SLC against 1.08 million million SLC in Poland, a difference of 158,420 million SLC.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.94 million million SLC | 332,826 million SLC | 1.61 million million SLC | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.32 million million SLC | 434,996 million SLC | 1.88 million million SLC | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 1.08 million million SLC | 775,625 million SLC | 304,453 million SLC | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1.24 million million SLC against 1.08 million million SLC in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 158,420 million SLC, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th and Poland ranks 62nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.