Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Ecuador
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 27,558 million SLC against 24,615 million SLC in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2,943 million SLC.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 128th and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 174 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,536 million SLC | 4,521 million SLC | 3,014 million SLC | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 27,405 million SLC | 11,721 million SLC | 15,684 million SLC | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 28,483 million SLC | 22,133 million SLC | 6,350 million SLC | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Ecuador or Papua New Guinea?
- Ecuador, at 27,558 million SLC against 24,615 million SLC in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
- 2,943 million SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Ecuador ranks 128th and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.