China, Macao SAR vs Switzerland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency

China, Macao SAR
91,082 million SLC
in 2023
Switzerland
85,979 million SLC
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
105th
Switzerland rank
107th

Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Switzerland
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200120122023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 91,082 million SLC against 85,979 million SLC in Switzerland, a difference of 5,103 million SLC.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Switzerland ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 105th and Switzerland ranks 107th of 174 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 17,674 million SLC 57,086 million SLC 39,411 million SLC Switzerland
2010s 66,998 million SLC 69,791 million SLC 2,794 million SLC Switzerland
2020s 95,849 million SLC 88,476 million SLC 7,372 million SLC China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, China, Macao SAR or Switzerland?
China, Macao SAR, at 91,082 million SLC against 85,979 million SLC in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between China, Macao SAR and Switzerland?
5,103 million SLC, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Switzerland?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Switzerland rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
China, Macao SAR ranks 105th and Switzerland ranks 107th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Switzerland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-central-government-value-standard-local-currency/china-macao-sar/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-central-government-value-standard-local-currency/china-macao-sar/switzerland/">China, Macao SAR vs Switzerland: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
189 places, 3,863 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.