Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malta: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 8,562 million SLC against 6,958 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1,604 million SLC.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Malta ranks 145th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,878 million SLC | 2,311 million SLC | 2,566 million SLC | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 6,223 million SLC | 3,689 million SLC | 2,534 million SLC | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 6,702 million SLC | 7,099 million SLC | 396.2 million SLC | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malta?
- Malta, at 8,562 million SLC against 6,958 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta?
- 1,604 million SLC, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Malta ranks 145th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.