Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Timor-Leste: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 24,138 million SLC against 991.77 million SLC in Timor-Leste, a difference of 23,146 million SLC.
That makes Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s figure about 24.3 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has been ahead every year.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 11th of 12 countries.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Timor-Leste?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 24,138 million SLC against 991.77 million SLC in Timor-Leste as of 2007.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Timor-Leste?
- 23,146 million SLC, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Timor-Leste?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2007.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Timor-Leste rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 11th of 12 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.