Belgium vs Djibouti: Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Belgium
- Djibouti
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 172,454 million SLC against 149,758 million SLC in Djibouti, a difference of 22,696 million SLC.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 91st and Djibouti ranks 94th of 174 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78,494 million SLC | 38,534 million SLC | 39,960 million SLC | Belgium |
| 2010s | 121,018 million SLC | 112,956 million SLC | 8,062 million SLC | Belgium |
| 2020s | 144,549 million SLC | 141,724 million SLC | 2,825 million SLC | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency, Belgium or Djibouti?
- Belgium, at 172,454 million SLC against 149,758 million SLC in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency between Belgium and Djibouti?
- 22,696 million SLC, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Djibouti?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Djibouti rank globally for total expenditure (central government) — value standard local currency?
- Belgium ranks 91st and Djibouti ranks 94th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (central government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.