Republic of Moldova vs Tonga: There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence
There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Tonga
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 1 Score against 1 Score in Tonga, a difference of 0 Score.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 12 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3 Score | 0 Score | 0.3 Score | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 1 Score | 0.6 Score | 0.4 Score | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 1 Score | 1 Score | 0 Score | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence, Republic of Moldova or Tonga?
- Republic of Moldova, at 1 Score against 1 Score in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence between Republic of Moldova and Tonga?
- 0 Score, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Tonga rank globally for there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 12 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence (1=yes; 0=no) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.