Hong Kong vs Zambia: Textiles and clothing
Textiles and clothing over time
- Hong Kong
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 3.2% against 3.1% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 84th of 154 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 46.6% | 9.2% | 37.5% | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 39.5% | 11.9% | 27.6% | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 33.0% | 10.7% | 22.3% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 7.4% | 0.7% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 2.8% | 0.5% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher textiles and clothing, Hong Kong or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 3.2% against 3.1% in Hong Kong as of 2024.
- What is the difference in textiles and clothing between Hong Kong and Zambia?
- 0.1%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Zambia rank globally for textiles and clothing?
- Hong Kong ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 84th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Textiles and clothing refers to industries in ISIC (rev. 3) divisions 17-19 and includes manufacturing of textiles, apparel, dyeing of fur, and tanning of leather. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).