Burundi vs Finland: Textiles and clothing
Textiles and clothing over time
- Burundi
- Finland
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.6% against 0.5% in Finland, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 145th and Finland ranks 147th of 154 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 14.6% | 8.9% | 5.8% | Burundi |
| 1980s | 9.1% | 6.0% | 3.1% | Burundi |
| 1990s | 8.7% | 3.7% | 5.0% | Burundi |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.3% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 1.4% | 0.8% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher textiles and clothing, Burundi or Finland?
- Burundi, at 0.6% against 0.5% in Finland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in textiles and clothing between Burundi and Finland?
- 0.1%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2015.
- How do Burundi and Finland rank globally for textiles and clothing?
- Burundi ranks 145th and Finland ranks 147th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Textiles and clothing refers to industries in ISIC (rev. 3) divisions 17-19 and includes manufacturing of textiles, apparel, dyeing of fur, and tanning of leather. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).