Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Textiles and clothing
Textiles and clothing over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 4.0% against 3.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 75th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 77th of 154 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.4% | 2.2% | 6.2% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 8.1% | 5.8% | 2.2% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 7.6% | 4.5% | 3.0% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 4.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher textiles and clothing, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 4.0% against 3.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in textiles and clothing between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for textiles and clothing?
- Argentina ranks 75th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 77th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Textiles and clothing refers to industries in ISIC (rev. 3) divisions 17-19 and includes manufacturing of textiles, apparel, dyeing of fur, and tanning of leather. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).