Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Terms of trade adjustment
Terms of trade adjustment over time
- Montenegro
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 544.71 million constant LCU against 402.35 million constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 142.36 million constant LCU.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -47.47 million constant LCU | -1.31 billion constant LCU | 1.26 billion constant LCU | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 108.69 million constant LCU | 1.05 billion constant LCU | 945.74 million constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 426.88 million constant LCU | 374.24 million constant LCU | 52.64 million constant LCU | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher terms of trade adjustment, Montenegro or Zimbabwe?
- Montenegro, at 544.71 million constant LCU against 402.35 million constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in terms of trade adjustment between Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 142.36 million constant LCU, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Zimbabwe rank globally for terms of trade adjustment?
- Montenegro ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The terms of trade adjustment is equal to the capacity to import (current price value of exports of goods and services deflated by the import price index) less exports of goods and services in constant prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.