Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Terms of trade adjustment
Terms of trade adjustment over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 748.12 billion constant LCU against 578.13 billion constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 169.98 billion constant LCU.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 20th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 178 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 485.19 billion constant LCU | -286.18 billion constant LCU | 771.37 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2010s | 537.43 billion constant LCU | -474.54 billion constant LCU | 1.01 trillion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2020s | 539.09 billion constant LCU | -273.99 billion constant LCU | 813.08 billion constant LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher terms of trade adjustment, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Chad, at 748.12 billion constant LCU against 578.13 billion constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in terms of trade adjustment between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 169.98 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for terms of trade adjustment?
- Chad ranks 20th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The terms of trade adjustment is equal to the capacity to import (current price value of exports of goods and services deflated by the import price index) less exports of goods and services in constant prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.